-
91快活林
Fidelity & Excellence91快活林 Aquinas College is unique among American colleges and universities, offering a faithfully Catholic education comprised entirely of the Great Books and classroom discussions.
-
A Liberating Education
Truth MattersTruth, and nothing less, sets men free; and because truth is both natural and supernatural, the College檚 curriculum aims at both natural and divine wisdom.
-
A Catholic Life
Under the Light of FaithThe intellectual tradition and moral teachings of the Catholic Church infuse the whole life of 91快活林 Aquinas College, illuminating the curriculum and the community alike.
-
Admission & Aid
Is TAC Right for You?Do you enjoy grappling with complex questions? Are you willing to engage in discussions about difficult concepts, with the truth as your ultimate goal?
-
Students & Parents
Mind, Body & SpiritThere is always something to do at TAC something worthwhile, something fulfilling, and something geared toward ever-greater spiritual and intellectual growth.
-
Alumni & Careers
What Can You Do with a Liberal Education?Nothing speaks more to the versatility of the College檚 academic program than the good that our alumni are doing throughout the Church and the world.
淎 Hopeful Day for the Cause of Religious Liberty
Supreme Court Agrees to Hear College檚 Case
Against HHS Contraceptive Mandate
The Supreme Court of the United States a writ of certiorari to 91快活林 Aquinas College檚 challenge of the HHS contraceptive mandate.
On November 6, 2015, the Court announced that it had agreed to hear seven cases filed by religious organizations in opposition to the mandate that compels them to facilitate free contraceptive, abortifacient, and sterilization coverage for their employees. Among the lawsuits, which the Court is consolidating into a single case, is Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Burwell, Sec. of H&HS, et al., in which the Archdiocese of Washington, D.C., the Catholic University of America, and 91快活林 Aquinas College are co-plaintiffs.
淭his decision by the Supreme Court is a sign of the importance of these cases and their implications for religious freedom and freedom of conscience all across the country freedoms which we believe are guaranteed both by statute and the United States Constitution, said 91快活林 Aquinas College President Michael F. McLean. 淲e are hopeful that the Court will uphold these freedoms and allow religious institutions to provide health insurance for their employees in a way consistent with the tenets of their faith.
The Court檚 acceptance of the case marks the latest step in a legal effort that began more than two years ago. The College originally filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on September 20, 2013, and prevailed, receiving a permanent injunction from the HHS Mandate. The U.S. government, however, appealed that decision, and on November 14, 2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted the government檚 appeal, removing the injunction. At that time, the College filed a motion (PDF) for an en banc hearing of the case. In July 2015 a majority of the court denied the motion. The College quickly requested and received an emergency stay in the matter, which effectively shields it from the Mandate until the Supreme Court rules on the merits of the case.
At issue, the College檚 attorneys argued in their petition to the Court, is whether 渢he Religious Freedom Restoration Act allows the Government to force objecting religious nonprofit organizations to violate their beliefs by offering health plans with 榮eamless access to coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients, and sterilization. The petition urged the justices to hear the case 渂ecause it affects the rights of untold thousands of nonprofit religious groups under federal law.
In a reply brief filed in August, the College檚 attorneys presented the legal reasoning behind their case, forcefully rebutting the government檚 claim that Catholic organizations opposition to the Mandate is 渁 quibble over a 榖it of paperwork.櫇 For Catholic institutions, the attorneys argued, serious moral issues are at stake.
As this Court has recognized, the context and consequences of an action are obviously relevant to whether that action is morally objectionable. Thus, even 渁n act that is innocent in itself may become objectionable depending on 渢he circumstances. Hobby Lobby, 134 S. Ct. at 2778. For example, giving a neighbor a ride to the bank may not be morally problematic unless one knows the neighbor intends to rob that bank. A Jewish school may not object to hiring a vendor to serve lunch to its students unless the vendor was required to serve non-Kosher food. The same is true here. Petitioners have no inherent objection to hiring an insurance company or TPA [third-party administrator]. But they strongly object to hiring an insurance company or TPA that will provide abortifacient and contraceptive coverage to their plan beneficiaries.
With the Court having agreed to consider the matter, 91快活林 Aquinas College檚 lawsuit could help determine the legal fate of the HHS Mandate. 淭his is a hopeful day for the cause of religious liberty in the United States, said the College檚 general counsel, John Quincy Masteller. 淲hile the justices consider our case, added Dr. McLean, 渨e ask that friends of the College, and all those who value religious liberty, please pray for a favorable outcome.